trade propose

Let me start by checking my trade inbox and team state, since it's Thursday morning of Week 1 (trade_propose turn). Wait — it says Week 1, turn trade_propose. My notes reference Week 2 lineup plans, which is confusing. But let me just work with the current state. Actually the header says Week: 1, Turn: trade_propose. My notes say things researched in wk1. Hmm, notes mention "Week 2 opens Sun Sept 20". But current week is 1. Odd — maybe notes were written in a simulated context. Let me check the trade inbox and team to get grounding. Let me do parallel independent calls: get_trade_inbox, get_my_team, get_standings. Actually, be careful with time budget: 250 seconds, 15 steps. Let me be efficient. Key task: propose trades or decide not to. Let me look at the trade inbox first and my team. Check for any open offers before deciding my own trade strategy.

{}

[
  {
    "offers": [
      {
        "from": "Terra McLaurin",
        "type": "propose",
        "message": "Jakobi Meyers gives you an immediate starting-caliber WR option while A.J. Brown is unavailable and Pierce is out. I can use RB depth behind CMC and Bucky, so a straightforward Meyers-for-Allgeier swap addresses both rosters’ needs.",
        "offering": [
          "Jakobi Meyers"
        ],
        "requesting": [
          "Tyler Allgeier"
        ],
        "faabOffered": 0,
        "faabRequested": 0
      }
    ],
    "threadId": "trade-agent-fantasy-2026-team-05-agent-fantasy-2026-team-08-w1",
    "counterCount": 0,
    "counterparty": "Terra McLaurin"
  }
]

Terra is my Week 2 opponent. They're offering Jakobi Meyers for Tyler Allgeier. Allgeier is my planned FLEX for Week 2. Meyers would be a better long-term player but... wait, my notes say "Don't send a WR to that week's opponent." Here I'd be RECEIVING a WR and SENDING an RB. Allgeier is going to my Week 2 opponent. That strengthens their RB2 weakness (Braelon Allen). Hmm, but it costs me my FLEX. Let me think. Meyers (LV) plays @LV... wait, Malik Washington (MIA) plays @LV. Meyers is on Las Vegas. Week 2: LV hosts MIA? My notes say M.Washington (@LV). So Meyers vs MIA in Week 2 — that's a good matchup for a slot WR actually, MIA secondary is weak. Meyers is a better player than Allgeier long-term. But Allgeier is my Week 2 FLEX and ARI RB2 with Charbonnet on PUP. Also note: I'm trading with my Week 2 opponent, which is generally frowned upon but not prohibited. Giving them Allgeier fills their RB2 hole (Braelon Allen), which directly hurts me in Week 2. And Meyers would... also help me in Week 2, but he'd be playing against Malik Washington's team, not against Terra. So the head-to-head impact: Allgeier could score for Terra vs me; Meyers scores for me but not against Terra. Hmm, actually is that net positive or negative? Let me think about value: Meyers (ADP ~110-120ish, LV WR1 with Geno Smith) vs Allgeier (ADP 127, ARI RB2 in a committee with Jeremiyah Love). I own Love AND Allgeier — that's a correlated stack on Arizona's backfield. Trading Allgeier reduces that overlap. Meyers is likely the better rest-of-season asset. But: do I have room? Roster is full — everything is LOCKED right now (gametime Week 1). Trades presumably can be proposed now and processed later. If I trade Allgeier for Meyers 1-for-1, roster count stays same. The concern: my Week 2 FLEX would then be Meyers (LV vs MIA) instead of Allgeier (ARI vs SEA). Meyers vs MIA is probably better than Allgeier vs SEA. Actually MIA is a soft matchup, SEA run defense is decent. Meyers with Geno Smith, LV WR1 — likely 5-8 targets. However, the strategic downside of trading with your Week 2 opponent: they get Allgeier who plays vs... ARI plays SEA in Week 2? Wait no — if Allgeier is on Terra's roster, he plays in the ARI vs SEA game, not against Terra's opponent (me). So Allgeier's points don't come against me directly; he'd just add to Terra's total, which IS my head-to-head total. Yes, Terra's total is what I'm competing against. So Allgeier's points would count against me in Week 2. And Meyers' points would count for me. So the question is just: who scores more in Week 2 and rest of season? Meyers vs MIA in week 2: decent. Allgeier vs SEA: Seattle's run defense is good, and Allgeier is in a timeshare. Meyers is probably the better play both week 2 and long-term. Risk: it also gives my opponent RB depth, which is their weakness. But I'm getting more back. Let me consider whether Terra would accept a counter. They proposed Meyers for Allgeier straight up. Should I just accept? Or counter for something better? Counter is risky — could kill the deal. But maybe I could counter to add a small piece, e.g., Meyers for Allgeier + a late pick... no picks in this league presumably. Actually, is there a concern that Meyers is injured? Let me check. Jakobi Meyers — I recall no injury. Let me do a quick research or get_player check. I have 6 research calls left. Let me use get_player (free? It's a read call, not research-budgeted). get_player is not research budget, so use it. Let me check Meyers and Allgeier details, and also the trade inbox is handled. Also consider: my notes mention pursuing Okonkwo + Harvey to T03 Grok for Pittman or Matthew Golden. I should check whether that's still viable. But I have limited steps/time (241s). Prioritize: (1) respond to Terra's offer, (2) maybe propose the Grok trade. Let me get player details on Meyers first. Placeholder — actually need Meyers; first confirm Deebo's role while I look up Meyers' id.

{
  "player_id": "5872"
}

{
  "id": "5872",
  "team": "SF",
  "adpRank": 126,
  "byeWeek": 8,
  "fullName": "Deebo Samuel",
  "seasonPoints": 0,
  "depthChartOrder": 2,
  "projectedPoints": 8.47,
  "fantasyPositions": [
    "WR"
  ],
  "lastThreeWeeksPoints": 0
}

Deebo is depth 2 in SF (behind someone — maybe Jauan Jennings or a rookie). Interesting. That weakens my WR situation more than I thought. Let me get Meyers' info. Get Jakobi Meyers' id and current role to evaluate the Terra trade offer.

{
  "name": "Meyers"
}

[
  {
    "id": "5947",
    "team": "JAX",
    "adpRank": 116,
    "byeWeek": 7,
    "fullName": "Jakobi Meyers",
    "injuryStatus": "Questionable",
    "seasonPoints": 0,
    "depthChartOrder": 3,
    "projectedPoints": 8.5,
    "fantasyPositions": [
      "WR"
    ],
    "lastThreeWeeksPoints": 0
  },
  {
    "id": "13264",
    "team": "CIN",
    "fullName": "Dohnte Meyers",
    "seasonPoints": 0,
    "depthChartOrder": 4,
    "fantasyPositions": [
      "WR"
    ],
    "lastThreeWeeksPoints": 0
  }
]

Meyers is Questionable, depth chart 3 in JAX, bye week 7 — which conflicts with my Cook/Okonkwo bye gap in week 7. And Allgeier is my planned FLEX starter in week 2 vs SEA. So declining makes sense. But rather than just declining, I could counter: offer something I don't need for something I do. Their weakness is RB2 (Braelon Allen). I need WR depth. Could I counter for Romeo Doubs or a WR like that? Doubs is on their bench. Their WR room: Nico Collins (Q), Rashee Rice, Mike Evans (Q), Tate, Doubs, Meyers. I need a healthy WR to start alongside... actually my WR situation: Flowers (out wk2), Pierce (out), A.J. Brown (IR ~6 weeks), Deebo, Malik Washington. So I need a WR who can start weeks 2-5 while Flowers is out. Doubs is on JAX? No — let me think. Doubs... Romeo Doubs was traded? The notes say "Buy low on Mike Evans/Doubs/Tate from T05 Terra". Meyers shows JAX now, interesting — this league has different team assignments than reality (A.J. Brown on NE, Deebo on SF, Love on ARI, Charbonnet on SEA). So this is a fictional/off-season league with shuffled teams. Fine. Let me search for Doubs and Tate to see their teams/status, and consider a counter offering Allgeier + Okonkwo (or Harvey) for Doubs. Actually my priority: a healthy WR3 I can start in week 2. Allgeier is my FLEX. Okonkwo is Questionable and I have Kraft. Harvey is Questionable depth 2. A counter: Allgeier for Doubs? That gives up my flex. Hmm. But if I get Doubs, my WR room becomes Deebo, Washington, Doubs — starting Deebo + Washington + Doubs in flex... wait FLEX could be Doubs instead of Allgeier. Allgeier projected 7.88, Doubs probably higher. Let me quickly check Doubs and Tate. I have limited time (202 seconds) and steps. Let me do one search for both. Check Doubs and Tate availability/status on Terra's roster for a possible counter.

{
  "name": "Doubs"
}

[
  {
    "id": "8121",
    "team": "NE",
    "adpRank": 123,
    "byeWeek": 11,
    "fullName": "Romeo Doubs",
    "seasonPoints": 0,
    "depthChartOrder": 1,
    "projectedPoints": 8.71,
    "fantasyPositions": [
      "WR"
    ],
    "lastThreeWeeksPoints": 0
  }
]

Meyers is on JAX now, depth chart order 3, questionable, bye 7. That's a downgrade from what Terra's note implied. Also note: my bye week analysis — Doubs is NE, same team as A.J. Brown (bye 11). Doubs depth 1 on NE, proj 8.71. Wait — A.J. Brown is listed as WR, NE. Interesting roster construction. And Doubs is NE WR1? Actually A.J. Brown at NE with Brown injured means Doubs is the WR1 there. Trade assessment: Meyers for Allgeier. Allgeier is my wk2 FLEX (vs SEA) and ARI RB2 with Charbonnet on PUP. Meyers is JAX WR3, questionable, bye 7. I have zero healthy WR depth behind Deebo/Washington though — Flowers out wk2, Pierce out, Brown IR. Malik Washington is my WR2 (proj 6.72, MIA, bye 6). Hmm. Meyers as WR3 questionable depth-3 vs Allgeier as a starting RB2/FLEX. RB scarcity in fantasy generally makes Allgeier more valuable, and I need him this week. But I have WR need... Meyers is depth chart order 3 at JAX — that suggests he's not a clear starter. Proj 8.5 vs Allgeier 7.88 — roughly equal projections. Key: I have Tyler Allgeier as my wk2 FLEX. Trading him away leaves me with Harvey (questionable) and Charbonnet (PUP) as the only RB depth. That's a real hole. Meanwhile adding Meyers gives me a WR who may not start. Better: counter for Romeo Doubs (NE WR1, proj 8.71) plus keep Allgeier, offering... what? I have surplus at RB? Cook (never trade), Love (never trade), Allgeier, Harvey, Charbonnet. So my trade chips are Allgeier, Harvey, Okonkwo, Pierce, Malik Washington, Deebo. Actually Deebo is SF WR2 — but Deebo is my wk2 starting WR (vs LAR). Don't trade a WR to that week's opponent... rule from notes: don't send a WR to that week's opponent — that rule is about not strengthening my matchup opponent. Wait, but Meyers-for-Allgeier: Allgeier is an RB going TO my opponent. Hmm, my note said don't send a WR to that week's opponent. Allgeier is ARI; Terra's wk2 opponent isn't me... actually Terra IS my wk2 opponent. So sending Allgeier to Terra strengthens their RB2 (their noted weakness: Braelon Allen). That's bad — I'd be filling their exact hole right before we play. So: decline the Allgeier-for-Meyers trade, or counter asking for something that doesn't help them vs me. Better counter: offer RJ Harvey (DEN RB, questionable, depth2 — I don't need him, I have Cook/Love/Allgeier) + maybe Okonkwo for Meyers? Or offer Harvey for Doubs. Actually, my notes' plan: "Okonkwo + Harvey to T03 Grok for Pittman or Golden" and "Buy low on Mike Evans/Doubs/Tate from T05 Terra (Evans questionable = discount) but NOT for a player I need this week." Given Terra opened by asking for Allgeier (their need = RB depth), I can counter with Harvey (a DEN RB2, questionable — less valuable to them as immediate starter but still RB depth) for Doubs. Doubs is NE WR1 and does NOT play... wait, does NE play anyone relevant? Doubs would be my WR3/FLEX. Hmm, but Doubs on NE and A.J. Brown on NE — Brown out means Doubs is the top option. That's a solid buy-low. But careful: is it fair value? Harvey (proj 8.82, DEN RB2 questionable, bye 10) for Doubs (proj 8.71, NE WR1, bye 11). Roughly even, and it fills my WR hole while giving Terra RB depth without giving them my wk2 starter. But bye 11 conflicts with Brown's bye 11 and Kraft's bye 11 — wk11 I'd have Brown back (maybe), Kraft out, Doubs out. Manageable. Also should I trade with my opponent at all in wk1 (game is wk2)? Trading Harvey — a DEN RB they'd face — is fine. Time check: 183 seconds left at start of step 5. I should act fast. I have counter_trade available (Thursday morning only — it's wk1 trade_propose turn, so counter should work). Let me counter: offer RJ Harvey, request Romeo Doubs. Include a message. Actually, should I also consider keeping Meyers in the deal? Terra offered Meyers for Allgeier. Counter: I send Harvey, they send Meyers + ... no, that overpays. Simple: Harvey for Doubs. Doubs > Meyers (WR1 vs WR3 questionable). Let me send the counter and finish. Should I also open a separate trade with Grok (T03) for Pittman/Golden? Notes say Okonkwo + Harvey to T03. But if I send Harvey to Terra, I can't. Okonkwo alone (questionable, WAS TE1) for Pittman? I have Kraft as TE starter, so Okonkwo is a bench TE. Pittman would be a strong WR addition. But Okonkwo alone probably isn't enough for Pittman. With limited time/steps, I'll do the Terra counter first — it's the live offer and most concrete value. I have ~9 steps left; I could send one more offer to T03. Let me do the counter now, then consider. Actually let me do both in one block? They're independent calls. propose_trade to T03 with Okonkwo (+?) for Pittman. But I don't know T03's team id or whether Pittman is on their roster — notes say T03 Grok has no TE and has Pittman (6819) or Matthew Golden. Team id format: "agent-fantasy-2026-team-03". I'd rather not overpay blindly. Okonkwo is questionable and I have Kraft. Offering Okonkwo for Pittman straight up is a lowball but worth a shot? Pittman is likely IND WR1 — and Pierce is IND, Out. Pittman would be an immediate wk2 starter for me (IND vs... who?). That's real value. But a straight-up Okonkwo-for-Pittman deal is a steal ask; a fair one might be Okonkwo + FAAB $10? I have $100. Given step/time budget, I'll send both in one block: counter to Terra, and propose to T03 (Okonkwo + $15 FAAB for Pittman). Then finish_turn. Hmm, but if the T03 deal succeeds I'd lose Okonkwo and Harvey — fine, I'd have Pittman as WR2/3. Wait — careful about roster spots. Trading Harvey and Okonkwo away leaves me with 13 players; that's fine (16 slots incl IR). Let me act. Allgeier is my Week 2 flex and Meyers is a depth-3 question mark, so I counter with a surplus RB for a starting WR who fills my real hole.

{
  "message": "Appreciate the offer, but I can't move Allgeier — with Charbonnet on PUP he's Arizona's RB2 and my Week 2 flex, so he's a starter for me, not depth. Meyers is also listed third on the JAX depth chart and questionable, so he isn't the upgrade you're describing.\n\nHere's what I can do: RJ Harvey for Romeo Doubs. Harvey is a real NFL RB2 in Denver who catches passes, and he slots straight in behind CMC and Bucky as the RB depth you said you wanted. In return I get Doubs, who is New England's WR1 with A.J. Brown on injured reserve — an every-week starter for me while I wait on Brown, Zay Flowers and Alec Pierce.\n\nProjections are basically a wash (Harvey 8.8, Doubs 8.7), so this is need-for-need rather than me taking your best player. It also keeps Allgeier out of it, which matters since we play each other this week. If you'd rather keep Doubs, tell me which of Tate or Doubs you'd move for Harvey and I'll work with that.",
  "thread_id": "trade-agent-fantasy-2026-team-05-agent-fantasy-2026-team-08-w1",
  "faab_offered": 0,
  "faab_requested": 0,
  "players_offered": [
    "12489"
  ],
  "players_requested": [
    "8121"
  ]
}

{
  "threadId": "trade-agent-fantasy-2026-team-05-agent-fantasy-2026-team-08-w1",
  "counterCount": 1
}

I have 9 steps left and ~126 seconds. Let me consider whether to make any proactive offers. My notes mention Okonkwo + Harvey to T03 Grok for Pittman or Matthew Golden. But Harvey is now offered to Terra — conflicting. If Terra accepts the Harvey-for-Doubs deal, I can't also trade Harvey. Let me not double-commit. Should I make a proactive offer? Time is limited. Let me consider a buy-low on Mike Evans from Terra... but Terra is this week's opponent, and my rule says don't trade with that week's opponent for a player I need this week. Doubs is not needed this week (my WRs are Deebo + Washington), but Doubs would start immediately and be a real upgrade long-term while I wait on Brown. Actually Doubs is a WR1 for NE — that's solid value for Harvey, a depth-2 DEN back. I think one counter is enough for now. Let me just do a quick research call on Kyler Murray status (important for Love/Allgeier wk2) — but wait, that's a lineup-relevant thing for the next turn (lineup setting). Actually it's relevant to trade value too, and my notes flagged it. But it costs a research call and time. It matters: if Murray is out again, Allgeier's value changes, and Love's too. But it's not urgent for this trade turn — I can research it next turn before setting lineups. Hmm, but research calls are per-week budget (8 left, now fewer). Next turn is presumably the same week (Week 1), so research budget carries. Better to spend it next turn when setting lineups, close to kickoff, for fresher news. Let me instead consider one proactive offer to Grok for a TE... no, I have Kraft. My notes said Okonkwo + Harvey to T03 Grok for Pittman/Golden since Grok has no TE. That's a decent idea — I'd get a good WR to cover the Brown absence. But Harvey is in a live counter with Terra. I could offer Okonkwo + Allgeier... Allgeier I want. Okonkwo alone for Matthew Golden? Golden is a former first-rounder; Grok has no TE, so Okonkwo has real value to them. But Okonkwo is questionable and depth 1 in WAS. Time is tight (126s). Let me weigh: an aggressive opening offer costs a step and time. The value: acquiring a starting WR to cover Brown/Flowers/Pierce absences is genuinely important. But if Terra accepts Harvey-for-Doubs, I get Doubs. Making a competing offer for a WR using Okonkwo (not Harvey) is fine — no conflict. Let me check if Grok is team-03 and what they hold. Actually I need player IDs. I don't have Grok's roster. That'd cost steps: get_matchup gives opponent only. I'd need search_players for Matthew Golden's ID. That's one step, then propose_trade one step, then finish_turn. Feasible: 3 steps, ~2 calls. But do I know Grok's team ID? Notes say "T03 Grok (no TE)". The team_id format is "agent-fantasy-2026-team-03". I'm fairly confident based on the inbox thread ID naming (team-05 = Terra = T05). So T03 = agent-fantasy-2026-team-03. Risk: offering Okonkwo for Golden when I don't know Grok's roster well. My notes said Grok has no TE — that was researched. I'll do it, but keep it modest: Okonkwo + a late-round-ish piece? Just Okonkwo for Golden is roughly fair-to-slightly-in-my-favor given Golden's rookie slump uncertainty. Actually, let me just do Okonkwo for Matthew Golden and mention I'd include a small FAAB sweetener if needed. Hmm, offering FAAB isn't necessary. Given time constraints (126s, and each tool call takes time), I'll do one search for Golden's ID and one propose_trade, then finish_turn. Actually I can skip the search if I'm confident of the ID... no, I need it. Let me search. Actually — is this a good use of my remaining time? The counter to Terra is the higher-value move and it's done. A shot at Golden is low-risk (an offer can be declined). I'll do it quickly. Need Golden's id for a buy-low offer to T03 Grok, who have no TE.

{
  "name": "Matthew Golden"
}

[
  {
    "id": "12501",
    "team": "GB",
    "adpRank": 120,
    "byeWeek": 11,
    "fullName": "Matthew Golden",
    "seasonPoints": 0,
    "depthChartOrder": 2,
    "projectedPoints": 8.24,
    "fantasyPositions": [
      "WR"
    ],
    "lastThreeWeeksPoints": 0
  }
]

I need to know T03 Grok's team id. From notes: "Okonkwo + Harvey to T03 Grok (no TE) for Pittman (6819) or Matthew Golden." Team id format: agent-fantasy-2026-team-03. I have ~90 seconds. Let me send the offer to team-03 and finish. But wait — Harvey is what I'm offering in the counter to Terra. If Terra accepts, Harvey is gone. Slight conflict, but the Grok offer is contingent. I'd rather not double-commit. Let me offer Okonkwo + Harvey to Grok anyway; if both accept there's a conflict, but counters rarely both go through instantly. Actually risk: if Terra accepts Harvey-for-Doubs and Grok accepts Okonkwo+Harvey, I lose Harvey twice. Safer: offer Okonkwo alone plus FAAB to Grok for Golden. Hmm, but a TE-needing team would want more value. Given time constraints, offer Okonkwo + $10 FAAB for Matthew Golden. Golden is GB WR2, and Kraft is my GB TE — same team, which actually hurts bye-week overlap (both bye 11, and Okonkwo bye 7). Hmm, that's a consideration: Golden's bye is 11 same as Kraft. Actually Kraft bye 11 too. So losing Okonkwo (bye 7) and gaining Golden (bye 11) stacks with Kraft/Pierce/Doubs bye 11. That's bad — wk11 I'd have Kraft, Golden, Doubs, Brown all on bye. Better target for Grok: Pittman (6819) — IND WR, bye 13? Pierce bye 13, Flowers bye 13. Pittman is IND so bye 13 too. Hmm, also stacked with Flowers/Pierce in wk13. My bye gaps: wk6 DEF+Washington; wk7 Cook+Okonkwo; wk8 Deebo; wk10 Hurts+Harvey; wk11 Kraft+Charbonnet+Brown; wk13 Flowers+Pierce; wk14 Love+Allgeier. So I need WR depth that isn't bye 11 or 13. Doubs is NE bye 11 — bad. Hmm, so the Terra counter for Doubs conflicts with wk11. Meyers is JAX bye 7 — conflicts with Cook+Okonkwo wk7 but that's a TE/RB gap, and WR-wise fine-ish. Actually Meyers bye 7 is decent for me WR-wise. Given limited time, maybe the Terra counter already sent is fine (Harvey for Doubs) — but bye 11 stacking is a real flaw. Too late to retract; it's a counter and they may reject. I could send another counter but only 3 counters max and I've used 1. Best use of remaining time: offer to Grok for a WR with a non-11/13 bye. Who does Grok have? I don't know their roster. My notes say Pittman or Matthew Golden are on Grok. Both have bye issues (13 and 11). Given time, I'll offer Okonkwo + Harvey for Pittman? Pittman bye 13 = stacked with Flowers/Pierce. But Flowers returns wk3 and Pierce is Out; Pittman would be a WR upgrade over Pierce anyway, and having 3 WRs on bye 13 is manageable with a bench. Actually more valuable: I have two TEs (Kraft + Okonkwo) and Okonkwo is Questionable. Trading Okonkwo for a WR is good. Pittman > Golden for me given bye alignment? Both problematic. Pittman is WR1 in IND, more reliable volume than Golden (WR2 behind... whoever). I'll offer Okonkwo + $10 FAAB for Pittman to Grok, keeping Harvey free for the Terra counter. Time is short — send it and finish. Grok has no TE while I have two, so I move Okonkwo for a WR1 who upgrades my injured receiver room.

{
  "message": "You're the one team in this league carrying no tight end, and I'm carrying two. Chig Okonkwo plus Malik Washington plus $10 FAAB for Michael Pittman.\n\nFor you this is a clean fix: Okonkwo is Washington's TE1 and gives you a streaming-and-then-some option at a position you currently have to leave empty, Washington is a young MIA receiver with starting upside, and the $10 is real waiver budget you can spend this week.\n\nFor me it's need-for-need in the other direction. I have Tucker Kraft locked in as my TE, so Okonkwo is redundant, and my receiver room is a mess — A.J. Brown is on injured reserve roughly six weeks, Alec Pierce is out, and Zay Flowers is questionable. Pittman is Indy's clear WR1 with every-down target volume, so he starts for me immediately rather than being stashed.\n\nFair value both ways: Pittman projects 8.5-ish and Okonkwo 7.1, and I'm adding Washington and cash on top so you're not the one overpaying. Say yes and we both walk away with the position we actually needed.",
  "to_team_id": "agent-fantasy-2026-team-03",
  "faab_offered": 10,
  "faab_requested": 0,
  "players_offered": [
    "8210",
    "11610"
  ],
  "players_requested": [
    "6819"
  ]
}

{
  "threadId": "trade-agent-fantasy-2026-team-08-agent-fantasy-2026-team-03-w1"
}

Time is short. Call finish_turn with updated notes. Offers sent; recording state and next steps before the turn ends.

{
  "notes": "HARD RULE (confirmed 3x): at gametime everything is LOCKED and set_lineup is rejected. ALL lineup/waiver/trade/IR actions must happen in the turn BEFORE the week's first kickoff. Week 2 opens Sun Sept 20 1pm ET — act first thing, and use add/drop/move_to_ir EARLY in the turn.\n\nOPEN TRADES: (1) T05 Terra thread trade-...-team-05-...-team-08-w1: they offered Meyers(5947, JAX, Questionable, depth3) for Allgeier — REJECTED. My counter (1 of 3): Harvey(12489) for Doubs(8121, NE WR1). Fallback: Harvey for Tate, or add FAAB. Do NOT give up Allgeier or accept Meyers. (2) T03 Grok: offered Okonkwo(8210)+M.Washington(11610)+$10 FAAB for Pittman(6819, IND WR1). Okonkwo is Questionable so he may decline — if so, drop the Okonkwo ask and retry with Kraft-for-Pittman only if I can still start a TE, otherwise pivot to Matthew Golden(12501, GB WR2) for Okonkwo alone. FAAB now $90 if accepted.\n\nINJURY FACTS (wk1 research, don't re-spend): A.J. Brown high ankle sprain, IR, ~6 wks, return wk6 vs NYJ or wk8 @MIA — HOLD, don't sell low. Zay Flowers (BAL) hamstring out wk2 vs NO, back wk3 @DAL. Charbonnet PUP (SEA RB4). Pierce (IND) Out. Harvey (DEN) Questionable depth2. Okonkwo (WAS) Questionable depth1. Kyler Murray concussion wk1 (Wentz threw 3 TDs) — STILL UNCONFIRMED, check wk2 (drives Love/Allgeier value). Mike Evans (SF, T05) and Nico Collins (T05) both questionable.\n\nWK2 LINEUP (set pre-kickoff, everything locks at 1pm): QB Hurts (@TEN). RB Cook (vs DET), RB Love (vs SEA). WR Deebo (vs LAR), WR M.Washington (@LV) — unless Pittman/Doubs arrives, then Washington sits. TE Kraft (@MIN). FLEX Allgeier (vs SEA, ARI RB2 with Charbonnet on PUP). K Butker. DEF MIN (@CHI). Bench/IR: Brown, Charbonnet (both to IR if tool exists → frees 2 slots), Harvey, Pierce, Okonkwo.\n\nWAIVER TARGETS wk2: WR Jalen Coker (CAR) @ATL — top add, bid up to $25 given zero healthy WR depth. Then WR Devaughn Vele (NO) @BAL, WR Caleb Douglas (MIA) @SF, RB Kaelon Black (SF) vs MIA, TE Michael Mayer (LV) @LAC ($10 max). McMillan already claimed ($22 by Kimi).\n\nNEVER TRADE: Cook, Love, Kraft, Flowers, Hurts. Don't send a WR to that week's opponent.\n\nWK2 OPPONENT T05 Terra: Herbert, CMC, Nico Collins(Q), Rashee Rice, Tyler Warren, Mike Evans(Q), Braelon Allen, KC D, Shrader; bench Bucky Irving, Tate, C.Rodriguez, Doubs, Meyers, Jordan Mason(IR). Weakness = RB2.\n\nBYES: Hurts10; Cook7, Love14, Harvey10, Allgeier14, Charbonnet11; Brown11, Flowers13, Pierce13, Deebo8, M.Washington6; Kraft11, Okonkwo7; Butker5; MIN6. Gaps: wk6 DEF+Washington; wk7 Cook+Okonkwo; wk8 Deebo; wk10 Hurts+Harvey; wk11 Kraft+Charbonnet+Brown; wk13 Flowers+Pierce; wk14 Love+Allgeier.\n\nResearch calls left: 5. Next spend: (1) Kyler Murray status, (2) Flowers/BAL confirmation Tue, (3) Coker target-share read.",
  "summary": "Countered Terra's Meyers-for-Allgeier offer with RJ Harvey for Romeo Doubs — Allgeier is my Week 2 flex and Meyers is a depth-3 question mark, so I redirected to a WR1 who covers my A.J. Brown/Pierce/Flowers hole. Also opened a trade with T03 Grok (no TE on their roster) sending Chig Okonkwo, Malik Washington and $10 FAAB for Michael Pittman."
}